Doolta
KwalitAI
Live site →Code quality made visible: a free evaluation of a public GitHub repository, a README badge, a history, and an optional private report on what to fix first.
Project Details
- Free public evaluationSix axis grades, an overall score, a README badge and the history of evaluations. It does not require buying the report.
- Private audit report, paidFindings located in the code, explained, with recommendations in priority order. 490 EUR for one public GitHub repository, one follow-up verification included.
- Real problemA README explains what a piece of software does, but says little about the quality of its code. Maintainers need to find the weak spots and to share an evaluation whose scope and method anyone can check.
- ConstraintsKeep public metrics apart from detailed findings, which stay private because some describe exploitable weaknesses. Tie every evaluation to a commit and a method version. State the limits of grades and comparisons.
- Structural choicesSix axes: architecture, performance, consistency, security, documentation and correctness. Each evaluation is dated and tied to its commit and method. Defects are classed as tool-detectable or found by review, and missing quality checks are counted apart. A change between two evaluations is shown as a number only when the method allows the comparison. The analysis comes from 10x-review, Doolta’s review tool; KwalitAI is the site and the product.
- What it proves todayThe site publishes the evaluation of its own code and a complete audit example, with the status of each finding after the fixes. Among the problems raised: a query with no result limit, a missing secret detection check, and a missing repository check when an identical report is re-imported.
- Associated offerThe same quality approach, applied to your systems: builds on the Flash Audit offer.
Make quality visible
The free evaluation turns a public repository into something you can read at a glance: a grade from 1 to 10 on each of the six axes, an overall score capped by the weakest axis, finding counts and a badge for the README. Each evaluation states its commit, date and method, and the history shows how the repository moves over time.
From grades to prioritized fixes
A grade says where it hurts, not what to change. The private audit report gives every finding with its location in the code, its cause and its class, then recommendations in priority order. It is a review that reports what it finds: no promise of bug-free code, no certification, no exhaustiveness. Online ordering is not open yet; the audit is requested through the KwalitAI contact form.
The method applied to KwalitAI’s own code
KwalitAI is evaluated with its own method. The public evaluation of the site’s code is online, and the complete example publishes the audit report of that same code, with the status of each finding at the follow-up review. This project shows Doolta’s software quality approach in action: measuring, explaining, prioritizing, then verifying the fixes.